GGUS vs VTI
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GGUS or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGUS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $478M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 362 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.01% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.27% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $16,661 | $17,195Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 30, 2023 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.8 years).
GGUS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
GGUS vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGUS returned +5.27% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, GGUS is up 4.01% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GGUS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGUS charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGUS currently yields 0.43% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.2% of GGUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 62.1% of VTI's money is in holdings GGUS also owns.
Most of GGUS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
338 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 362 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 829 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GGUS (35.4% of the fund), and 12 for GGUS that do not appear in VTI (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGUS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.28% | 6.40% | 6.88% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.05% | 6.29% | 2.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.78% | 4.79% | 0.01% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.20% | 2.90% | 2.30% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.21% | 2.31% | 1.90% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.83% | 2.56% | 1.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.52% | 1.70% | 1.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.75% | 1.29% | 2.46% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.71% | 1.22% | 2.49% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.30% | 1.35% | 1.95% |
98.2% of GGUS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGUS or VTI?
GGUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGUS or VTI?
Over the past year GGUS returned +5.27% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGUS or VTI?
GGUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GGUS -22.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GGUS and VTI?
GGUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGUS and VTI?
98.2% of GGUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 62.1% of VTI's is in holdings GGUS also owns. They hold 338 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGUS or VTI?
GGUS yields 0.43% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GGUS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.