GGUS vs VYM
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GGUS or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GGUS led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGUS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $478M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 362 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +11.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.81% | +16.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $16,568Best | $16,168 |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.6% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 30, 2023 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.8 years).
GGUS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
GGUS vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGUS returned +4.81% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, GGUS is up 3.51% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GGUS and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGUS charges 0.12% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $4 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGUS currently yields 0.43% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.7% of GGUS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 32.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GGUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
75 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 557 in VYM, against full books of 362 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 453 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GGUS (65.0% of the fund), and 244 for GGUS that do not appear in VYM (86.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGUS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.83% | 7.35% | 3.52% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.26% | 1.50% | 0.24% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.84% | 1.34% | 0.50% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.13% | 1.80% | 1.67% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.82% | 1.02% | 0.20% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.86% | 0.90% | 0.04% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.10% | 1.66% | 1.56% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.14% | 1.38% | 1.24% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.18% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.12% | 0.89% | 0.77% |
32.1% of VYM is already inside GGUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGUS or VYM?
GGUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGUS or VYM?
Over the past year GGUS returned +4.81% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGUS or VYM?
GGUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GGUS -22.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GGUS and VYM?
GGUS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGUS and VYM?
32.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GGUS also owns. 32.1% of VYM's is in holdings GGUS also owns. They hold 75 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGUS or VYM?
GGUS yields 0.43% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GGUS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GGUS led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.