HKND vs QQQ
Humankind US Stock ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
HKND has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. HKND offers more diversification with 1,001 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $142M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.19% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Humankind | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HKND vs QQQ Performance
Humankind US Stock ETF (HKND) is a ETF from Humankind and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, HKND is up 12.19% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, HKND compounded at +10.05% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HKND and QQQ share 64 holdings out of 996 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or QQQ?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while QQQ charges 0.18%. HKND is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HKND or QQQ?
Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HKND annualized +8.92% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HKND or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HKND and QQQ?
HKND and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and QQQ?
HKND and QQQ share 64 common holdings with a 19.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 996 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or QQQ?
HKND yields 2.12% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so HKND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.