HKND vs VYM
Humankind US Stock ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, HKND or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. HKND is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $142M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 13.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $15,070 | $16,935Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.6%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Humankind | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 291 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HKND has data through Dec 1, 2025 and VYM through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2021 to Dec 1, 2025 (4.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $4 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
50.1% of HKND's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 68.8% of VYM's money is in holdings HKND also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 304 days apart, HKND as of Sep 30, 2025 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
317 positions in common, counted across the 959 positions we hold weights for in HKND and 557 in VYM, against full books of 1,001 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 219 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HKND (28.2% of the fund), and 551 for HKND that do not appear in VYM (49.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HKND | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.17% | 7.35% | 7.18% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.23% | 2.51% | 0.28% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.65% | 3.82% | 3.17% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.37% | 1.80% | 0.57% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.21% | 0.15% | 3.06% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.61% | 1.37% | 0.24% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.40% | 1.31% | 0.09% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.92% | 1.52% | 0.60% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 1.46% | 0.74% | 0.72% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 2.10% | 0.06% | 2.04% |
68.8% of VYM is already inside HKND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or VYM?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HKND or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both HKND and VYM?
HKND and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and VYM?
68.8% of VYM's money is in holdings HKND also owns. 68.8% of VYM's is in holdings HKND also owns. They hold 317 positions in common, counted across the 959 positions we hold weights for in HKND and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or VYM?
HKND yields 2.12% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than HKND?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. HKND is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.