HKND vs VTI
Humankind US Stock ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.19% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Humankind | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
HKND vs VTI Performance
Humankind US Stock ETF (HKND) is a ETF from Humankind and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, HKND is up 12.19% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, HKND compounded at +10.05% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, HKND has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HKND and VTI share 788 holdings out of 2957 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or VTI?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HKND or VTI?
Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HKND annualized +8.92% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HKND or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HKND and VTI?
HKND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and VTI?
HKND and VTI share 788 common holdings with a 33.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2957 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or VTI?
HKND yields 2.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HKND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.