HKND vs IVV
Humankind US Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. HKND offers more diversification with 1,001 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.19% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Humankind | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
HKND vs IVV Performance
Humankind US Stock ETF (HKND) is a ETF from Humankind and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, HKND is up 12.19% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, HKND compounded at +10.05% per year against +22.19% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, HKND has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HKND and IVV share 342 holdings out of 1121 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or IVV?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HKND or IVV?
Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HKND annualized +8.92% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HKND or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HKND and IVV?
HKND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and IVV?
HKND and IVV share 342 common holdings with a 34.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or IVV?
HKND yields 2.12% while IVV yields 1.10%, so HKND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.