HKND vs IVV
Humankind US Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HKND or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. HKND is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $142M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $15,070 | $18,685Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.6%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Humankind | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 291 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HKND has data through Dec 1, 2025 and IVV through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2021 to Dec 1, 2025 (4.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
81.2% of HKND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 77.5% of IVV's money is in holdings HKND also owns.
Most of HKND is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 335 days apart, HKND as of Sep 30, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
331 positions in common, counted across the 959 positions we hold weights for in HKND and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1,001 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 152 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HKND (21.2% of the fund), and 518 for HKND that do not appear in IVV (17.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HKND | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.63% | 7.02% | 4.39% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.10% | 8.07% | 7.97% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.11% | 5.69% | 3.58% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.54% | 3.00% | 1.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.74% | 3.84% | 3.10% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.51% | 1.38% | 1.13% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.21% | 0.06% | 3.15% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.23% | 0.97% | 1.26% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.37% | 0.68% | 1.69% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.30% | 0.67% | 1.63% |
81.2% of HKND is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or IVV?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HKND or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both HKND and IVV?
HKND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and IVV?
81.2% of HKND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 77.5% of IVV's is in holdings HKND also owns. They hold 331 positions in common, counted across the 959 positions we hold weights for in HKND and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or IVV?
HKND yields 2.12% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HKND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HKND?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. HKND is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.