HKND vs VOO
Humankind US Stock ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. HKND offers more diversification with 1,001 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HKND | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,001 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.19% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Humankind | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HKND vs VOO Performance
Humankind US Stock ETF (HKND) is a ETF from Humankind and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, HKND is up 12.19% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, HKND compounded at +10.05% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.7% for HKND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for HKND and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HKND charges 0.11% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HKND currently yields 2.12% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HKND and VOO share 342 holdings out of 1123 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HKND or VOO?
HKND has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HKND or VOO?
Over the past year HKND returned +5.80% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HKND annualized +8.92% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HKND or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.7% for HKND. Worst drawdown: HKND -19.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HKND and VOO?
HKND and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between HKND and VOO?
HKND and VOO share 342 common holdings with a 34.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HKND or VOO?
HKND yields 2.12% while VOO yields 1.09%, so HKND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.