PBCS vs QQQ
Portfolio Building Block World Consumer Staples ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PBCS or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
PBCS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBCS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $1M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 69 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +6.66% | +18.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.1% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Portfolio Building Block ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PBCS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PBCS vs QQQ Performance
Portfolio Building Block World Consumer Staples ETF (PBCS) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, PBCS is up 6.66% versus a gain of 18.04% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBCS charges 0.14% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $18 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBCS currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
27.6% of PBCS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings PBCS also owns.
PBCS and QQQ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in PBCS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 69 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for PBCS (91.8% of the fund), and 31 for PBCS that do not appear in QQQ (42.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
27.6% of PBCS is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBCS or QQQ?
PBCS has an expense ratio of 0.14% while QQQ charges 0.18%. PBCS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PBCS and QQQ?
27.6% of PBCS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.3% of QQQ's is in holdings PBCS also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in PBCS and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBCS or QQQ?
PBCS yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PBCS?
PBCS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.