PBCS vs VOO

PBCS vs VOO

Which is better, PBCS or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPBCSVOO
Expense Ratio0.14%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings69506
YTD Return+6.95%+12.64%Best
1Y Return-+16.84%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.10%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.87%
Top 10 Weight59.1%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyPortfolio Building Block ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 24, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PBCS vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PBCS vs VOO Performance

Portfolio Building Block World Consumer Staples ETF (PBCS) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PBCS is up 6.95% versus a gain of 12.64% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PBCS charges 0.14% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBCS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PBCS already in VOO67.7%
VOO already in PBCS4.5%

67.7% of PBCS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.5% of VOO's money is in holdings PBCS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in PBCS and 504 in VOO, against full books of 69 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 468 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PBCS (95.3% of the fund), and 6 for PBCS that do not appear in VOO (2.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PBCSWeight in VOODifference
WMTWalmart, Inc.9.93%0.70%9.23%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.9.04%0.63%8.41%
KOCoca Cola Co.8.21%0.52%7.69%
PGProcter & Gamble Company7.53%0.51%7.02%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.6.56%0.44%6.12%
PEPPepsico Inc.4.26%0.29%3.97%
MOAltria Group Inc2.88%0.17%2.71%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv1.90%0.12%1.78%
TGTTARGET CORP1.77%0.11%1.66%
CLColgate-Palmolive Co1.75%0.11%1.64%

67.7% of PBCS is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PBCSVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PBCS or VOO?

PBCS has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PBCS and VOO?

67.7% of PBCS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.5% of VOO's is in holdings PBCS also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in PBCS and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PBCS or VOO?

PBCS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PBCS?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.