IVV vs PBCS

IVV vs PBCS

Which is better, IVV or PBCS?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPBCS
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.14%
AUM$896.5B$1M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.00%
Holdings50869
YTD Return+12.65%Best+6.95%
1Y Return+16.83%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.09%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.87%-
Top 10 Weight38.9%Best59.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Portfolio Building Block ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs PBCS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs PBCS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Portfolio Building Block World Consumer Staples ETF (PBCS) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 12.65% versus a gain of 6.95% for PBCS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PBCS charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $14 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for PBCS.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in PBCS4.3%
PBCS already in IVV67.7%

4.3% of IVV's money is in holdings PBCS also owns. 67.7% of PBCS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in PBCS, against full books of 508 and 69.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 6 positions for PBCS that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.1% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in PBCS (95.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PBCSDifference
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.70%9.93%9.23%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.0.61%9.04%8.43%
KOCoca Cola Co.0.50%8.21%7.71%
PGProcter & Gamble Company0.51%7.53%7.02%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.0.44%6.56%6.12%
PEPPepsico Inc.0.26%4.26%4.00%
MOAltria Group Inc0.17%2.88%2.71%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv0.11%1.90%1.79%
TGTTARGET CORP0.11%1.77%1.66%
CLColgate-Palmolive Co0.10%1.75%1.65%

67.7% of PBCS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVPBCS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PBCS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PBCS charges 0.14%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PBCS?

67.7% of PBCS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 67.7% of PBCS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 69 in PBCS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PBCS?

IVV yields 1.10% while PBCS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PBCS better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.