QUSA vs VOO
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QUSA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.57% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 97 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.87% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.10% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QUSA vs VOO Performance
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) is a ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QUSA returned +5.10% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QUSA is up 9.87% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.1% for QUSA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.5% for QUSA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QUSA charges 0.97% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QUSA currently yields 15.57% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QUSA and VOO share 28 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QUSA or VOO?
QUSA has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QUSA or VOO?
Over the past year QUSA returned +5.10% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QUSA annualized +7.96% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QUSA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.1% for QUSA. Worst drawdown: QUSA -9.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QUSA and VOO?
QUSA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QUSA and VOO?
QUSA and VOO share 28 common holdings with a 36.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QUSA or VOO?
QUSA yields 15.57% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QUSA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.