THMZ vs VOO
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, THMZ or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THMZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 62 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.62% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.06% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $14,071 | $15,670Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.6%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.5 years).
THMZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
THMZ vs VOO Performance
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THMZ returned +9.06% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, THMZ is up 5.62% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 12.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for THMZ and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THMZ charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THMZ currently yields 0.23% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
53.3% of THMZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.4% of VOO's money is in holdings THMZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in THMZ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 62 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 457 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for THMZ (56.7% of the fund), and 5 for THMZ that do not appear in VOO (6.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in THMZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.07% | 7.55% | 4.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.12% | 7.05% | 4.93% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.65% | 5.36% | 1.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.70% | 4.13% | 0.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.30% | 3.24% | 0.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.14% | 2.86% | 0.72% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.90% | 0.48% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.32% | 0.63% | 2.69% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.68% | 1.41% | 0.27% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.47% | 1.21% | 0.26% |
53.3% of THMZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THMZ or VOO?
THMZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, THMZ or VOO?
Over the past year THMZ returned +9.06% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), THMZ annualized +25.57% vs +34.91% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, THMZ or VOO?
THMZ has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 12.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: THMZ -16.0% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both THMZ and VOO?
THMZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between THMZ and VOO?
53.3% of THMZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.4% of VOO's is in holdings THMZ also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in THMZ and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, THMZ or VOO?
THMZ yields 0.23% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than THMZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.