THMZ vs VTI
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THMZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.64% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.15% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
THMZ vs VTI Performance
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is a ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THMZ returned +12.15% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, THMZ is up 5.64% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for THMZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for THMZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THMZ charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THMZ currently yields 0.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
THMZ and VTI share 30 holdings out of 2815 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THMZ or VTI?
THMZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, THMZ or VTI?
Over the past year THMZ returned +12.15% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), THMZ annualized +27.55% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, THMZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for THMZ. Worst drawdown: THMZ -16.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both THMZ and VTI?
THMZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between THMZ and VTI?
THMZ and VTI share 30 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, THMZ or VTI?
THMZ yields 0.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.