THMZ vs VTI
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, THMZ or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THMZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 62 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.91% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.00% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,580 | $15,163Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Lazard Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).
THMZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
THMZ vs VTI Performance
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THMZ returned +7.00% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, THMZ is up 3.91% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for THMZ and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THMZ charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THMZ currently yields 0.23% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
55.2% of THMZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.7% of VTI's money is in holdings THMZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in THMZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 62 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,119 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for THMZ (59.8% of the fund), and 3 for THMZ that do not appear in VTI (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in THMZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.07% | 6.40% | 3.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.65% | 4.79% | 1.14% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.12% | 6.29% | 4.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.70% | 3.65% | 0.05% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.30% | 2.90% | 0.40% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.14% | 2.56% | 0.42% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.70% | 0.68% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.32% | 0.56% | 2.76% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.68% | 1.35% | 0.33% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 2.28% | 0.30% | 1.98% |
55.2% of THMZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THMZ or VTI?
THMZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, THMZ or VTI?
Over the past year THMZ returned +7.00% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), THMZ annualized +24.43% vs +34.63% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, THMZ or VTI?
THMZ has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: THMZ -16.0% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both THMZ and VTI?
THMZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between THMZ and VTI?
55.2% of THMZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.7% of VTI's is in holdings THMZ also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in THMZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, THMZ or VTI?
THMZ yields 0.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than THMZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.