USSG vs VOO

USSG vs VOO

Which is better, USSG or VOO?

Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. USSG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: USSGLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUSSGVOO
Expense Ratio0.09%0.03%Best
AUM$586M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.95%1.04%
Holdings510506
YTD Return+13.88%Best+13.59%
1Y Return+17.71%Best+16.33%
3Y Return (annualized)+24.12%Best+23.81%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.09%Best+14.02%
Volatility (annualized)16.8%16.4%Best
Max Drawdown-34.4%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$19,330Best$19,271
Top 10 Weight48.2%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyXtrackers ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 6, 2019Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2019 to Oct 2, 2026 (7.6 years).

USSG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.6 years both funds cover.

USSG vs VOO Performance

Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF (USSG) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USSG returned +17.71% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, USSG is up 13.88% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.

Over three years, USSG compounded at +24.12% per year against +23.81% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.09% and +14.02% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, USSG has the edge at +16.25% annualized vs +15.78%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

USSG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for USSG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

USSG charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USSG currently yields 0.95% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

USSG already in VOO97.1%
VOO already in USSG51.8%

97.1% of USSG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 51.8% of VOO's money is in holdings USSG also owns.

Most of USSG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, USSG as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

224 positions in common, counted across the 251 positions we hold weights for in USSG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 510 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 266 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for USSG (47.6% of the fund), and 21 for USSG that do not appear in VOO (1.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in USSGWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp14.12%7.55%6.57%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp10.38%5.36%5.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A5.96%3.24%2.72%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C4.71%2.62%2.09%
TSLATesla Inc2.99%1.36%1.63%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.65%1.41%1.24%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.34%1.21%1.13%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common1.87%0.96%0.91%
VVisa Inc Class A1.81%0.93%0.88%
MAMastercard Inc1.35%0.72%0.63%

97.1% of USSG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

USSGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, USSG or VOO?

USSG has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, USSG or VOO?

Over the past year USSG returned +17.71% vs +16.33% for VOO, so USSG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), USSG annualized +16.25% vs +15.78% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, USSG or VOO?

USSG has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: USSG -34.4% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both USSG and VOO?

USSG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between USSG and VOO?

97.1% of USSG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 51.8% of VOO's is in holdings USSG also owns. They hold 224 positions in common, counted across the 251 positions we hold weights for in USSG and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, USSG or VOO?

USSG yields 0.95% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than USSG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. USSG led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.