VONG vs VT
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 10,133 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VONG | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $43.5B | $78.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.60% | |
| Holdings | 373 | 10,133 | |
| YTD Return | +3.04% | +12.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.30% | +22.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.57% | +20.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.48% | +10.46% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 16.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -50.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2010 | Jun 24, 2008 |
VONG vs VT Performance
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VONG returned +10.30% while VT returned +22.06%. Year to date, VONG is up 3.04% versus a gain of 12.78% for VT.
Over three years, VONG compounded at +20.57% per year against +20.16% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +11.48% and +10.46% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.53% annualized vs +7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.9% for VONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for VONG and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VONG charges 0.06% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $6 annually. On income, VONG currently yields 0.48% against 1.60% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
VONG and VT share 345 holdings out of 9298 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VONG or VT?
VONG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VT charges 0.06%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VONG or VT?
Over the past year VONG returned +10.30% vs +22.06% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VONG annualized +15.53% vs +7.27% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VONG or VT?
VT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.9% for VONG. Worst drawdown: VONG -32.7% vs VT -50.6%.
Should I hold both VONG and VT?
VONG and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VONG and VT?
VONG and VT share 345 common holdings with a 33.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 9298 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VONG or VT?
VONG yields 0.48% while VT yields 1.60%, so VT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.