AOD vs FQAL
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FQAL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.73% | 1.15% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 130 | |
| YTD Return | +18.14% | +12.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.16% | +18.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.54% | +20.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.16% | +11.60% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -34.1% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 12, 2016 |
AOD vs FQAL Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year AOD returned +31.16% while FQAL returned +18.32%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.14% versus a gain of 12.67% for FQAL.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.54% per year against +20.16% for FQAL; over five years the annualized figures are +11.16% and +11.60% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FQAL has the edge at +13.76% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.0% for FQAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -34.1% for FQAL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FQAL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $15 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.73% against 1.15% for FQAL.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and FQAL share 13 holdings out of 197 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FQAL?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or FQAL?
Over the past year AOD returned +31.16% vs +18.32% for FQAL, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AOD annualized -4.03% vs +13.76% for FQAL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or FQAL?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.0% for FQAL. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs FQAL -34.1%.
Should I hold both AOD and FQAL?
AOD and FQAL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and FQAL?
AOD and FQAL share 13 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 197 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FQAL?
AOD yields 11.73% while FQAL yields 1.15%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.