CANQ vs XQQI
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, CANQ or XQQI?
CANQ costs less.
CANQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANQ | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $20M | $402M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.72% | 16.85% |
| Holdings | 58 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +0.68% | +5.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.48% | - |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2024 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CANQ vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CANQ vs XQQI Performance
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF (CANQ) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, CANQ is up 0.68% versus a gain of 5.18% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANQ charges 0.94% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $98 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANQ currently yields 4.72% against 16.85% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 46.6% of XQQI's money is in holdings CANQ also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CANQ, our book for it covers 90.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CANQ and 101 in XQQI, against full books of 58 and 213.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CANQ | Weight in XQQI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.03% | 7.91% | 6.88% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.16% | 8.39% | 8.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.58% | 6.25% | 4.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.64% | 4.32% | 3.68% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.52% | 3.45% | 2.93% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.69% | 3.00% | 2.31% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.06% | 3.02% | 2.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.06% | 2.61% | 2.55% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.65% | 1.98% | 1.33% |
| WMTWalmart Inc | 0.09% | 2.45% | 2.36% |
46.6% of XQQI is already inside CANQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANQ or XQQI?
CANQ has an expense ratio of 0.94% while XQQI charges 0.98%. CANQ is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CANQ and XQQI?
At least 46.6% of XQQI's money is in holdings CANQ also owns. Our book for CANQ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CANQ and 101 in XQQI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANQ or XQQI?
CANQ yields 4.72% while XQQI yields 16.85%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than CANQ?
CANQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.