FFOG vs REGS
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, FFOG or REGS?
REGS has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $376M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +11.89% | +15.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.60% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.15% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.6% | 49.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FFOG vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FFOG vs REGS Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, FFOG is up 11.89% versus a gain of 15.98% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $35 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
67.5% of FFOG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 55.2% of REGS's money is in holdings FFOG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 60 in REGS, against full books of 43 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for FFOG (41.7% of the fund), and 14 for FFOG that do not appear in REGS (17.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOG | Weight in REGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.88% | 11.05% | 1.17% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.77% | 8.14% | 2.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.13% | 2.17% | 6.96% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.26% | 1.68% | 6.58% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.67% | 4.73% | 0.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.71% | 5.63% | 1.92% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.94% | 4.84% | 0.90% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.06% | 3.42% | 1.36% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.39% | 2.51% | 0.12% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.92% | 0.97% | 2.95% |
67.5% of FFOG is already inside REGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or REGS?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOG and REGS?
67.5% of FFOG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 55.2% of REGS's is in holdings FFOG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in FFOG and 60 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or REGS?
FFOG yields 0.00% while REGS yields 0.00%, so REGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than FFOG?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.