NANC vs NUDG
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, NANC or NUDG?
NUDG has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $271M | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 0.48% |
| Holdings | 181 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +8.95%Best | +5.01% |
| 1Y Return | +7.34% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.35% | - |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NANC vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NANC vs NUDG Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, NANC is up 8.95% versus a gain of 5.01% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $61 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.19% against 0.48% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 27.9% of NANC's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NUDG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
NANC and NUDG share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 41 in NUDG, against full books of 181 and 43.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANC | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.03% | 7.58% | 0.55% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.64% | 6.53% | 1.89% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.95% | 3.63% | 2.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.03% | 4.72% | 3.69% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 0.49% | 4.79% | 4.30% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.25% | 2.01% | 1.24% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 2.43% | 2.03% | 0.40% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.21% | 3.38% | 3.17% |
| ABTAbbot Laboratories | 0.76% | 1.82% | 1.06% |
| BLKBlackrock Inc Cl A Com | 0.18% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
27.9% of NANC is already inside NUDG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or NUDG?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and NUDG?
At least 27.9% of NANC's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. Our book for NUDG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 41 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or NUDG?
NANC yields 0.19% while NUDG yields 0.48%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than NANC?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.