SASS vs VOO

SASS vs VOO

Which is better, SASS or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSASSVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$76M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings24509
YTD Return-5.16%+13.31%Best
1Y Return-+17.07%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.19%
Top 10 Weight58.6%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyMD SassVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 4, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SASS vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SASS vs VOO Performance

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SASS is down 5.16% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SASS charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SASS currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

SASS already in VOO59.3%
VOO already in SASS5.6%

59.3% of SASS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.6% of VOO's money is in holdings SASS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in SASS and 494 in VOO, against full books of 24 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 474 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SASS (93.6% of the fund), and 8 for SASS that do not appear in VOO (36.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SASSWeight in VOODifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.20%4.13%3.07%
HSICHenry Schein Inc6.64%0.01%6.63%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.6.10%0.20%5.90%
DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc5.85%0.04%5.81%
AMEAmetek Inc5.48%0.09%5.39%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.5.04%0.14%4.90%
WELLWelltower, Inc.4.86%0.26%4.60%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.4.71%0.28%4.43%
MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc.4.06%0.05%4.01%
ARESAres Management Corp A3.08%0.04%3.04%

59.3% of SASS is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SASSVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SASS or VOO?

SASS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SASS and VOO?

59.3% of SASS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.6% of VOO's is in holdings SASS also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in SASS and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, SASS or VOO?

SASS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than SASS?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.