ABFL vs BAGX
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF
Which is better, ABFL or BAGX?
BAGX has been ahead.
ABFL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABFL | BAGX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.73% |
| AUM | $606M | $183M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 114 | 190 |
| YTD Return | +7.60%Best | -0.79% |
| 1Y Return | +6.84% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.51% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.31% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.8% | 29.3%Best |
| Fund Family | FCF Advisors | Bridgeway Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2016 | Jul 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ABFL vs BAGX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ABFL vs BAGX Performance
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds. Year to date, ABFL is up 7.60% versus a loss of 0.79% for BAGX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABFL charges 0.49% per year while BAGX charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $73 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.60% against 0.00% for BAGX.
Holdings Overlap
38.0% of ABFL's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 25.9% of BAGX's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 92 in BAGX, against full books of 114 and 190.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for BAGX that do not appear in our book for ABFL (70.5% of the fund), and 36 for ABFL that do not appear in BAGX (58.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABFL | Weight in BAGX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 5.76% | 4.88% | 0.88% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.99% | 5.22% | 0.23% |
| LRCXLam Research Corporation | 2.45% | 1.67% | 0.78% |
| FFIVF5 Networks Inc. | 2.50% | 1.56% | 0.94% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.88% | 1.07% | 1.81% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.58% | 1.05% | 1.53% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc. | 2.07% | 1.36% | 0.71% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.70% | 0.61% | 2.09% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.00% | 1.31% | 0.69% |
| EXELExelixis Inc | 1.65% | 1.32% | 0.33% |
38.0% of ABFL is already inside BAGX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABFL or BAGX?
ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while BAGX charges 0.73%. ABFL is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and BAGX?
38.0% of ABFL's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 25.9% of BAGX's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 92 in BAGX.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or BAGX?
ABFL yields 0.60% while BAGX yields 0.00%, so ABFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BAGX better than ABFL?
ABFL has a lower expense ratio. BAGX led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 29.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.