ACVF vs NUDG
American Conservative Values ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, ACVF or NUDG?
ACVF has been ahead.
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.61%Best |
| AUM | $149M | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Holdings | 780 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +9.89%Best | +4.39% |
| 1Y Return | +10.79% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.83% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.97% | - |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACVF vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVF vs NUDG Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, ACVF is up 9.89% versus a gain of 4.39% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $61 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.48% against 0.48% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 25.0% of ACVF's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NUDG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
ACVF and NUDG share little of their money.
32 positions in common, counted across the 388 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 41 in NUDG, against full books of 780 and 43.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.72% | 7.58% | 1.86% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.42% | 4.72% | 2.30% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.40% | 3.98% | 3.58% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.57% | 2.34% | 0.77% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.68% | 2.00% | 0.32% |
| WMTWalmart Inc | 1.71% | 1.75% | 0.04% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.84% | 2.25% | 1.41% |
| ETNEaton Corporation Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.59% | 2.38% | 1.79% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.05% | 1.90% | 0.85% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.78% | 2.01% | 1.23% |
25.0% of ACVF is already inside NUDG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or NUDG?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and NUDG?
At least 25.0% of ACVF's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. Our book for NUDG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 388 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 41 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or NUDG?
ACVF yields 0.48% while NUDG yields 0.48%, so ACVF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than ACVF?
NUDG has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.