FFOG vs IWF
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Which is better, FFOG or IWF?
Nearly the same fund. IWF costs less.
IWF has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOG | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $341M | $112.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Holdings | 1,667 | 751 |
| YTD Return | +0.34%Best | -0.86% |
| 1Y Return | -2.04%Best | -2.65% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.87%Best | +18.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -23.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $18,087Best | $17,146 |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 22, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3 years).
FFOG vs IWF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
FFOG vs IWF Performance
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFOG returned -2.04% while IWF returned -2.65%. Year to date, FFOG is up 0.34% versus a loss of 0.86% for IWF.
Over three years, FFOG compounded at +20.87% per year against +18.92% for IWF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 16.0% for IWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for FFOG and -23.4% for IWF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOG charges 0.41% per year while IWF charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $18 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOG currently yields 0.00% against 0.36% for IWF.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFOG and IWF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOG or IWF?
FFOG has an expense ratio of 0.41% while IWF charges 0.18%. IWF is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFOG or IWF?
Over the past year FFOG returned -2.04% vs -2.65% for IWF, so FFOG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFOG or IWF?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 16.0% for IWF. Worst drawdown: FFOG -25.4% vs IWF -23.4%.
Should I hold both FFOG and IWF?
FFOG and IWF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOG or IWF?
FFOG yields 0.00% while IWF yields 0.36%, so IWF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWF better than FFOG?
IWF has a lower expense ratio. FFOG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.