GINX vs VOO
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GINX or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GINX led over 1Y and the full window. GINX is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GINX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $106M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.08% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 160 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.51%Best | +13.21% |
| 1Y Return | +28.51%Best | +17.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.7%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.5%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $15,836Best | $15,709 |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 29, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 29, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026 (2.6 years).
GINX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
GINX vs VOO Performance
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GINX returned +28.51% while VOO returned +17.37%. Year to date, GINX is up 14.51% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 9.7% for GINX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.5% for GINX and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GINX charges 1.02% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GINX currently yields 4.08% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
40.3% of GINX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.9% of VOO's money is in holdings GINX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
42 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in GINX and 494 in VOO, against full books of 160 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 445 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GINX (86.3% of the fund), and 39 for GINX that do not appear in VOO (28.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GINX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.75% | 1.46% | 1.29% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 2.11% | 0.63% | 1.48% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.31% | 0.96% | 0.35% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 1.84% | 0.30% | 1.54% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.60% | 0.50% | 1.10% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.05% | 1.00% | 0.05% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 1.88% | 0.11% | 1.77% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.29% | 0.57% | 0.72% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.50% | 0.34% | 1.16% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 1.70% | 0.12% | 1.58% |
40.3% of GINX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GINX or VOO?
GINX has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GINX or VOO?
Over the past year GINX returned +28.51% vs +17.37% for VOO, so GINX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GINX or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 9.7% for GINX. Worst drawdown: GINX -12.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both GINX and VOO?
GINX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GINX and VOO?
40.3% of GINX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.9% of VOO's is in holdings GINX also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in GINX and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GINX or VOO?
GINX yields 4.08% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GINX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GINX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GINX led over 1Y and the full window. GINX is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.