PJFG vs REGS
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF vs Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, PJFG or REGS?
PJFG has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFG | REGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $144M | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 78 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +12.03% | +16.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.58% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.32% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 49.2%Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PJFG vs REGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PJFG vs REGS Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, PJFG is up 12.03% versus a gain of 16.92% for REGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFG charges 0.75% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $35 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for REGS.
Holdings Overlap
68.8% of PJFG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 50.1% of REGS's money is in holdings PJFG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 60 in REGS, against full books of 78 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for PJFG (46.3% of the fund), and 20 for PJFG that do not appear in REGS (27.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJFG | Weight in REGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.88% | 11.05% | 0.83% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.64% | 8.14% | 0.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 9.31% | 1.68% | 7.63% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.93% | 4.84% | 1.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.89% | 5.63% | 0.74% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.56% | 4.73% | 1.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.80% | 2.17% | 3.63% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.34% | 3.42% | 0.92% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.84% | 2.51% | 1.33% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.79% | 0.39% | 3.40% |
68.8% of PJFG is already inside REGS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFG or REGS?
PJFG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while REGS charges 0.35%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFG and REGS?
68.8% of PJFG's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 50.1% of REGS's is in holdings PJFG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 60 in REGS.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFG or REGS?
PJFG yields 0.00% while REGS yields 0.00%, so REGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REGS better than PJFG?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over 1Y. REGS is less concentrated, with 49.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.