VOO vs XCHG

VOO vs XCHG

Which is better, VOO or XCHG?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOXCHG
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.50%
AUM$997.4B$710M
Dividend Yield1.04%0.36%
Holdings509591
YTD Return+12.50%Best+9.82%
1Y Return+17.58%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.95%-
Top 10 Weight36.4%Best41.3%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)AllianceBernstein L.P.
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 7, 2010Dec 12, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VOO vs XCHG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VOO vs XCHG Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Year to date, VOO is up 12.50% versus a gain of 9.82% for XCHG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while XCHG charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.36% for XCHG.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in XCHG85.6%
XCHG already in VOO86.7%

85.6% of VOO's money is in holdings XCHG also owns. 86.7% of XCHG's money is in holdings VOO also owns.

Most of XCHG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

366 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 586 in XCHG, against full books of 509 and 591.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 94 positions for XCHG that do not appear in our book for VOO (8.3% of the fund), and 134 for VOO that do not appear in XCHG (14.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VOOWeight in XCHGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.51%8.06%0.55%
AAPLApple, Inc6.59%5.11%1.48%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 374.30%6.20%1.90%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.62%4.97%1.35%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.59%3.91%1.32%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.77%3.49%0.72%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.25%2.30%0.95%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.92%2.85%0.93%
VVisa Inc0.87%2.78%1.91%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.47%0.91%0.56%

86.7% of XCHG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VOOXCHG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or XCHG?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XCHG charges 0.50%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XCHG?

86.7% of XCHG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 86.7% of XCHG's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 366 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 586 in XCHG.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XCHG?

VOO yields 1.04% while XCHG yields 0.36%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XCHG better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.