QRMI vs XXQQ

QRMI vs XXQQ

Which is better, QRMI or XXQQ?

XXQQ costs less.

XXQQ has a lower expense ratio. QRMI is less concentrated, with 47.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%.

Lower Fees: XXQQLess Concentrated: QRMI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQRMIXXQQ
Expense Ratio0.60%0.30%Best
AUM$15M$864,529.7
Dividend Yield12.49%0.00%
Holdings21298
YTD Return+1.80%Best-8.83%
1Y Return+3.02%-
3Y Return (annualized)+7.59%-
5Y Return (annualized)+1.61%-
Top 10 Weight47.7%Best48.4%
Fund FamilyGLOBALXETFSSubversive Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 25, 2021Oct 8, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QRMI vs XXQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare QRMI against instead:QRMI vs SPYQRMI vs QQQQRMI vs VOOQRMI vs VTIXXQQ against:XXQQ vs VXUS

QRMI vs XXQQ Performance

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Subversive Growth 100 Redacted ETF (XXQQ) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Year to date, QRMI is up 1.80% versus a loss of 8.83% for XXQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QRMI charges 0.60% per year while XXQQ charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $30 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRMI currently yields 12.49% against 0.00% for XXQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QRMI already in XXQQ94.8%
XXQQ already in QRMI98.8%

94.8% of QRMI's money is in holdings XXQQ also owns. 98.8% of XXQQ's money is in holdings QRMI also owns.

Most of XXQQ is already inside QRMI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

96 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QRMI and 98 in XXQQ, against full books of 212 and 98.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1 positions for XXQQ that do not appear in our book for QRMI (0.2% of the fund), and 3 for QRMI that do not appear in XXQQ (6.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QRMIWeight in XXQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.21%8.40%0.19%
AAPLApple Inc7.82%8.45%0.63%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.27%6.65%0.38%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.56%4.77%0.21%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.30%4.35%0.05%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.97%4.33%0.36%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.43%3.19%0.24%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.21%2.78%0.43%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.99%2.64%0.35%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.57%2.79%0.22%

98.8% of XXQQ is already inside QRMI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QRMIXXQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QRMI or XXQQ?

QRMI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while XXQQ charges 0.30%. XXQQ is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QRMI and XXQQ?

98.8% of XXQQ's money is in holdings QRMI also owns. 98.8% of XXQQ's is in holdings QRMI also owns. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QRMI and 98 in XXQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QRMI or XXQQ?

QRMI yields 12.49% while XXQQ yields 0.00%, so QRMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XXQQ better than QRMI?

XXQQ has a lower expense ratio. QRMI is less concentrated, with 47.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.