TACU vs VOO

TACU vs VOO

Which is better, TACU or VOO?

TACU costs less.

TACU has a lower expense ratio. TACU is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: TACULess Concentrated: TACU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTACUVOO
Expense Ratio0.00%Best0.03%
AUM$16M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.08%
Holdings559509
YTD Return+13.20%+13.37%Best
1Y Return-+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.89%
Top 10 Weight35.3%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 10, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TACU vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TACU vs VOO Performance

T. Rowe Price Active Core US Equity ETF (TACU) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TACU is up 13.20% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TACU charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TACU currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

TACU already in VOO91.0%
VOO already in TACU94.5%

91.0% of TACU's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 94.5% of VOO's money is in holdings TACU also owns.

Most of VOO is already inside TACU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

392 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in TACU and 505 in VOO, against full books of 559 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 107 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TACU (5.0% of the fund), and 125 for TACU that do not appear in VOO (5.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TACUWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.35%7.51%0.16%
AAPLApple, Inc6.25%6.59%0.34%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.10%4.30%0.80%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.60%3.62%0.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A3.70%3.25%0.45%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.83%2.77%0.06%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C1.79%2.59%0.80%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.87%1.92%0.05%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.44%2.02%0.58%
TSLATesla Motors Inc1.22%1.84%0.62%

94.5% of VOO is already inside TACU.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TACUVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TACU or VOO?

TACU has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. TACU is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TACU and VOO?

94.5% of VOO's money is in holdings TACU also owns. 94.5% of VOO's is in holdings TACU also owns. They hold 392 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in TACU and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, TACU or VOO?

TACU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TACU?

TACU has a lower expense ratio. TACU is less concentrated, with 35.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.